Braden Shick vs Kosuke Shibano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 05:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Shick vs K. Shibano

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Shick 1 - 0 Shibano
They have played 2 sets in total, with Braden Shick winning 2 and Kosuke Shibano winning 0. The last match between Braden Shick and Kosuke Shibano was at the M15 Tanagura, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Braden Shick getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shick | 1 |
| Shibano | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Tanagura(10-21-25)
B. Shick vs K. Shibano H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.52% (39-30) | Career Total W/L | 53.57% (15-13) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Shick vs K. Shibano Match Preview:
- In recent months, Braden Shick has demonstrated a stronger second serve, winning 46.22% of points, compared to Kosuke Shibano’s 37.50%.
- When considering return games, Shick again outperforms Shibano, particularly on second serve returns, seizing 42.45% of points versus Shibano’s 18.18%.
- How do they fare against breakpoints? Shick has shown superior handling under pressure, saving 51.52% of breakpoints, whereas Shibano has saved 20.00%.
- Despite Shibano having a slightly better overall match win rate over the past year (56.00% against Shick’s 53.85%), Shick's stats suggest he performs better under critical situations.
- Analyzing surface preferences, Shibano has excelled on Hard courts (58% win rate), while Shick struggles slightly more on this surface (51%).
- Both players primarily compete at the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF level, with Shick having a higher recent win rate of 59.09% in this category, compared to Shibano’s 56.00%.
- Shibano has faced opponents with a tougher average rank (211.92), compared to Shick (339.81), which may give him more high-level experience.
- Regarding deciding set outcomes, Shick shows a slight edge, winning 38% of such sets recently, compared to Shibano's 33% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
As we assess both players' recent performances and capabilities, the statistics reveal notable distinctions in their strengths and weaknesses. Braden Shick demonstrates a clear advantage in second serve points and return games, both crucial in predicting match success. His ability to save breakpoints further enhances his standing, indicating resilience under pressure.
Although Kosuke Shibano possesses a marginally higher match-winning percentage over the past year, his challenges with return points and breakpoint saves may hinder his ability to leverage this experience advantage. Shibano does shine on hard courts, which could favor him slightly, but Shick's adaptability and pressure handling might offset this edge.
In conclusion, while both players exhibit competitive strengths, Braden Shick appears to have the upper hand due to his superior performance in crucial statistical areas. Thus, based on the data, Shick is the more likely winner in the upcoming match.
Braden Shick vs Kosuke Shibano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Shick vs K. Shibano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:52 | Average Match Time | 1:22:52 |
| 62% (32/52) | 1st Serve % | 60% (31/52) |
| 69% (22/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (16/31) |
| 75% (15/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (28/52) | Return Points Win % | 29% (15/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Shick Recent Matches Played
K. Shibano Recent Matches Played

B. Shick vs K. Shibano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.52% (39/30) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.57% (15/13) |
| 56.76% (84/64) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.84% (34/28) |
| 53.21% (738/649) | Games Win/Loss | 52.12% (295/271) |
| 53.85% (28/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.00% (14/11) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 196 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 109 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 1:4:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 297.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 219.54 |
| 57% (1592/2795) | 1st Serve % | 73% (618/847) |
| 70% (1107/1592) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (389/618) |
| 50% (601/1203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (106/229) |
| 42% (103/243) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (41/113) |
| 37% (1018/2724) | Return Points Win % | 40% (369/917) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 61.29% (38/24) | Futures W/L | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 57% (38/67) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 50% (10/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 42% (5/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 92% (39/36) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (16/14) |
| 8% (39/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (16/2) |
| 10% (30/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (12/1) |